Showing posts with label Ranger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ranger. Show all posts

Friday, August 8, 2025

What's Wrong with the 5e Ranger?

First concept: playstyle. There are only three pure playstyles: martial, magic, skill. The quintessential classes are fighter, magic-user (or wizard), and thief (or rogue). Every other class is a hybrid or variation. Paladins, barbarians, and rangers were once variations or subclasses of fighter.

Second concept: specialties. What makes you special is that you can do something that no one else can do. When you take something special about one class and make it available to others, it is no longer a specialty and is trivial. For example, fighters were once the only class who could regularly hit for consistent damage. Now everyone has a way of doing consistent damage such as cantrips. Wilderness survival skills such as tracking were once unique to rangers.

Third concept: niche or identity. What is a ranger? A ranger is a character who defends civilization by fighting the evils that threaten it on the boarders of the wilderness. They are in essence a fighter who has traded heavy armor for wilderness survival skills. This is easily stolen from them by the Survival skill becoming available to other classes and by a lack of emphasis on the exploration phase of the game. A Rogue can put expertise into survival and out survival the ranger.

To summarize, Rangers were once a fighter subclass that is no longer special and they're part of a class roster in a game that underemphasizes exploration which is their brand.

What has modern WotC done for the ranger? Made the ranger a combination martial, magic, skill character, which we have plenty of, with features most players won't use such as nullifying difficult terrain when hexcrawling, or features that aren't as valuable as another feature from another class, like how favored enemy is not as good as sneak attack. Animal companion is not a worthwhile feature imo because why couldn't anyone have an animal companion when bloodhounds and game hawks ought to be a commodity you can buy from a trainer? Hunters mark? Why not just give the ranger bonus damage die on all attacks since they'll be using it constantly, and so it will simplify the Ranger player's turn? Call it a built-in hunter's mark damage die.

To fix the problem, you need to take the ranger's things away from the other classes and give them back to the ranger. It's like giving anyone else unarmored defense, battle rage or an inspiring voice that gives bonuses orcsneak attack. And they have to put in some really good exploration rules and instructions so people understand hexcrawling or point crawling and want to use these rules. I've had 5 GMs now, and none of them understand hexcrawling. They all handwave it. Even Matthew Mercer, celebrity GM, doesn't do hex crawling. Maybe hexcrawling just isn't that fun? Alternatively, make ranger a subclass of fighter or rogue.

Sunday, November 24, 2024

D&D Rangers Suck and it's 3e's Fault!

 If I was a pretty girl and I asked you what was special about you, you understand that I'm asking what is it that you can offer me that other guys can't. Your specialty is therefore what you can do that other people cannot do, or what you can do better. Rangers were special because they were the only ones who could do survival, then in 3e devs added the skill system which took what made the ranger special and made it available to everyone else, trivializing the Ranger. To compensate, devs gave rangers lame powers like animal companions which anyone can get b/c fantasy, and devs made rangers partial casters at early levels and whoopy for that. Who isn't a partial caster these days?


By comparison, the 5e Rogue can sneak attack for consistently more damage than rangers and rogues can also put expertise into survival. 5e Druids can cast good berry with a first level spell, 5e Clerics can create food and water (3rd level spell?), the 5e Outlander background can AUTOMATICALLY forage enough food for a party of 4 (or 5?). Furthermore, wilderness exploration is very non-present in 5e. Rangers suck because they don't have a specialty anymore. Also, who can describe what a ranger is without game mechanics? Can anyone even do that!


I recommend making the 5e Ranger a flavor or subclass of either Fighter or Rogue rather than it's own mid class. Alternatively, everyone play OSRIC instead. The SRD for OSRIC is free online. Seriously, for perspective, go read what it says a Ranger is compared to its other class options. You will see why ranger used to be special but now it isn't.